Build A UFO – an In-debth Description

How to Build a Flying Saucer

                               After So Many


                                Have Failed

                    An essay in Speculative Engineering


        At the  end  of  the nineteenth century, the most distinguished

   scientists and engineers  declared  that  no  known  combination  of

   materials and locomotion could be assembled into a  practical flying

   machine.  Fifty years  later  another  generation  of  distinguished

   scientists and engineers  declared   that   it  was  technologically

   infeasible for a  rocket ship to reach the moon.  Nevertheless,  men

   were getting off  the  ground  and  out  into space even while these

   words were uttered.

        In the last half of the twentieth  century,  when technology is

   advancing faster than   reports  can  reach  the   public,   it   is

   fashionable to hold  the  pronouncements  of  yesterday’s experts to

   ridicule.  But there is something  anomalous  about  the consistency

   with which eminent  authorities  fail  to  recognize   technological

   advances even while they are being made.  You must bear in mind that

   these men are  not  given  to making public pronouncements in haste;

   their conclusions are  reached  after  exhaustive  calculations  and

   proofs, and they are better informed about their subject than anyone

   else alive.  But by and large, revolutionary advances  in technology

   do not contribute  to  the advantage of established experts, so they

   tend to believe that the challenge cannot possibly be realized.

        The UFO  phenomenon  is  a   perversity   in   the   annals  of

   revolutionary engineering.  On the one hand, public authorities deny

   the existence of  flying  saucers and prove their  existence  to  be

   impossible.  This is  just  as  we  should  expect  from established

   experts.  But on the other hand,  people  who  believe  that  flying

   saucers exist have produced findings that only tend to prove that

   UFOs are technologically  infeasible  by  any known  combination  of

   materials and locomotion.

        There is  reason  to suspect that the people who believe in the

   existence of UFOs do not want to discover  the technology because it

   is not in the true believer’s self interest that a flying saucer be

   within the capability of human engineering.  The true believer wants

   to believe that  UFOs  are  of extraterrestrial origin because he is

   seeking some kind of relief from debt  and taxes by an alliance with

   superhuman powers.

        If anyone with mechanical ability really wanted  to  know how a

   saucer flies, he  would  study  the  testimonies to learn the flight

   characteristics of this craft, and  then  ask,  “How  can we do this

   saucer thing?”  This is probably what Werner Von Braun  said when he

   decided that it  was  in his self-interest to launch man into space:

   “How can we get this bird off the ground, and keep it off?”

        Well, what is a flying saucer?  It is a disc-shaped craft about

   thirty feet in diameter with a dome  in the center accommodating the

   crew and, presumably, the operating machinery.  And  it  flies.   So

   let us begin  by  building  a disc-shaped airfoil, mount the cockpit

   and the engine under a central canopy,  and  see  if  we can make it

   fly.  As a  matter  of fact, during World War II the  United  States

   actually constructed a number of experimental aircraft conforming to

   these specifications, and  photographs  of  the  craft are published

   from time to time in popular magazines about science and flight.  It

   is highly likely  that some of the  UFO  reports  before  1950  were

   sightings of these test flights.  See how easy it is when you ‘want’

   to find answers to a mystery?

        The mythical saucer also flies at incredible speeds.  Well, the

   speeds believed possible  depend  upon  the time and  place  of  the

   observer.  As stated earlier, a hundred years ago, twenty-five miles

   per hour was  legally  prohibited in the belief that such a terrific

   velocity would endanger human life.  So replace the propeller of the

   experimental disc airfoil with a modern  aerojet  engine.  Is mach 3

   fast enough for believers?

        But the true saucer not only flies, it also hovers.   You  mean

   like a Hovercraft?   One  professional engineer translated Ezekiel’s

   description of heavenly ships as a helicopter-cum-hovercraft.

        But what of the anomalous electromagnetic  effects  manifest in

   the space surrounding   a   flying  saucer?   Well,   Nikola   Tesla

   demonstrated a prototype of an electronic device that was eventually

   developed into the  electron  microscope,  the television screen, an

   aerospace engine called the Ion  Drive.   Since  World  War  II, the

   engineering of the Ion Drive has been advanced as the most promising

   solution to the propulsion of interplanetary spaceships.   The drive

   operates by charging   atomic  particles  and  directing  them  with

   electro-magnetic force as a jet to  the  rear,  generating a forward

   thrust in reaction.   The advantage of the Ion Drive  over  chemical

   rockets is that  a spaceship can sweep in the ions it needs from its

   flight path, like  an aerojet sucks  in  air  through  its  engines.

   Therefore, the ship  must carry only the fuel it needs  to  generate

   the power for its chargers; there is no need to carry dead weight in

   the form of  rocket  exhaust.   There  is  another  advantage  to be

   derived from ion rocketry: The top  speed  of  a  reaction engine is

   limited by the  ejection velocity of its exhaust.   An  ion  jet  is

   close to the  speed  of  light.   If  space  travel  is  ever  to be

   practical, transport will have to  achieve  a  large fraction of the

   speed of light.

        In 1972 the French journal Science et Avenir reported Franco-

   American research into  a  method  of ionizing the airstream flowing

   over the wings to eliminate sonic  boom,  a serious objection to the

   commercial success of  the  Concorde.  Four years  later  a  picture

   appeared in an  American  tabloid  of  a  model aircraft showing the

   current state of development.  The  photograph  shows  a disc-shaped

   craft, but not so thin as a saucer; it looks more like a flying

   curling stone.  In silent flight, the ionized air flowing around the

   craft glows as  a proper ufo should.  The last word  comes  from  an

   engineering professor at   the   local   university;  he  has  begun

   construction of a flying saucer in his backyard.

        To the true believer, the flying  saucer  has no jet.  It seems

   to fly by some kind of antigravity.  As antigravity  is not known to

   exist in physical  theory  or  experimental fact in popular science,

   the saucer is  clearly alien and beyond  human  comprehension.   But

   antigravity depends upon what you conceive gravity  to  be,  doesn’t


        For all  practical purposes, you do not have to understand what

   Newton and Einstien mean by gravity.   Gravity  is  an  acceleration

   downward, to the center of the earth.  Therefore, antigravity  is an

   acceleration upward.  As  far as practical engineering is concerned,

   any means to achieve a gain in altitude  is  an  antigravity engine.

   An airplane; a balloon; a rocket; a stepladder; all  are antigravity

   engines.  See how easy it is to invent an antigravity engine?

        There are three basic kinds of locomotive engines.  The primary

   principle is traction.  The foot and the wheel are traction engines.

   The traction engines  depend  upon  friction  against  a surrounding

   medium to generate movement, and locomotion  can proceed only as far

   and as speedily  as  the  surrounding  friction will  provide.   The

   second principle is  displacement.   The  balloon  and the submarine

   rise by displacing a denser medium;  they descend by displacing less

   that their weight.   The  tertiary  drive is the rocket  engine.   A

   rocket is driven  by  reaction  from the mass of material it ejects.

   Although a rocket  is  most  efficient   when   not   impeded  by  a

   surrounding medium, it must carry not only it’s fuel  but  also  the

   mass it must  eject.   As  a  consequence, the rocket is impractical

   where powerful acceleration is required  for  extended  drives.   In

   chemical rocketry, ten minutes is a long burn for powered flight.

   What is needed  for  practical antigravity locomotion  is  a  fourth

   principle which does   not  depend  upon  a  surrounding  medium  or

   ejection of mass.

        You must take notice that none  of the principles of locomotion

   required any new discovery.  they have all been around for thousands

   of years, and  engineering  only  implemented  the   principle  with

   increasing efficiency.  A  fourth  principle  of locomotion has also

   been around for  thousands  of  years:   It  is  centrifugal  force.

   Centrifugal force is  the principle of the military  sling  and  the

   medieval catapult.

        Everyone knows that centrifugal force can overcome gravity.  If

   directed upward, centrifugal   force   can   be  used  to  drive  an

   antigravity engine.  The problem engineers have been unable to solve

   is that centrifugal force is generated  in  all  directions  on  the

   plane of the  centrifuge.   It won’t provide locomotion  unless  the

   force can be  concentrated  in  one  direction.  The solution of the

   sling, of releasing the wheeling at the instant the centrifugal

   force is directed  along  the  ballistic  trajectory,  has  all  the

   inefficiencies of a cannon.  The  difficulty  of  the problem is not

   real, however.  There  is  a  mental  block preventing  people  from

   perceiving a centrifuge as anything other than a flywheel.

        A bicycle wheel is a flywheel.  If you remove the rim and tire,

   leaving only the  spokes  sticking  out of the hub, you still have a

   flywheel.  In fact, spokes alone make a more efficient flywheel than

   the complete wheel; this is because  momentum  only  goes up only in

   proportion to mass but with the square of speed.  Spokes are made of

   drawn steel with  extreme  tensile  strength,  so spokes  alone  can

   generate the highest  level  of centrifugal force long after the rim

   and tire have  disintegrated.   But   spokes  alone  still  generate

   centrifugal force equally  in  all  directions  from  the  plane  of

   rotation.  All you  have  to  do to concentrate centrifugal force in

   one direction is remove all the  spokes  but  one.   That  one spoke

   still functions as a flywheel, even though it is  not  a  wheel  any


        See how  easy  it is once you accept an attitude of solving one

   problem at a time as you come to it?   You  can even add a weight to

   the end of the spoke to increase the centrifugal force.

        But our   centrifuge   still  generates  a  centrifugal   force

   acceleration in all  directions  around  the  plane of rotation even

   though it doesn’t generate acceleration equally in all directions at

   the same time.  All we have managed  to do is make the whole ball of

   wire wobble around the common center of mass between  the  axle  and

   free end of the spoke.  To solve this problem, now that we have come

   to it, we need merely to  accelerate the spoke through a few degrees

   of arc and  then  let  it  complete  the cycle of revolution without

   power.  As long as it is accelerated  during  the  same  arc at each

   cycle, the locomotive   will   lurch   in   one  direction,   albeit

   intermittently.  But don’t forget that the piston engine also drives

   intermittently.  The regular centrifugal pulses can be evened out by

   mounting several centrifuges  on  the same axle so that a pulse from

   another flywheel takes over as soon  as  one  pulse of power is past

   it’s arc.

        The next problem facing us is that the momentum imparted to the

   centrifugal spoke is  carries  it all around the cycle  with  little

   loss of velocity.   The  amount  of  concentrated  centrifugal force

   carrying the engine  in the desired  direction  is  too  low  to  be

   practical.  Momentum is  half  the  product  of mass  multiplied  by

   velocity squared.  Therefore,  what  we  need  is a spoke that has a

   tremendous velocity with minimal mass.   They don’t make spokes like

   that for bicycle wheels.  A search through the engineers’ catalog

   however, turns up just the kind of centrifuge we need.   An electron

   has no mass  at  rest  (you  cannot find a smaller minimum mass than

   that); all it’s mass is inherent  in  its  velocity.  So we build an

   electron raceway in  the  shape  of  a  doughnut  in  which  we  can

   accelerate an electron  to  a  speed close to that of light.  As the

   speed of light  is  approached,   the   energy  of  acceleration  is

   converted to a  momentum approaching infinity.   s  it  happens,  an

   electron accelerator answering   our   need  was  developed  by  the

   University of California during the  last years of World War II.  It

   is called a betatron, and the doughnut is small enough to be carried

   comfortably in a man’s hands.

        We can visualize the operation of the Mark I from what is known

   about particle accelerators.   To  begin with, high energy electrons

   ionize the air surrounding them.   This causes the betatrons to glow

   like an annular neon tube.

        Therefore, around the rim of the saucer a ring  of  lights will

   glow like a  string  of  shining beads at night.  The power required

   for flight will ionize enough of the surrounding atmosphere to short

   out all electrical wiring in the  vicinity  unless  it  is specially

   shielded.  In theory, the top speed of the Mark I  is  close  to the

   speed of light;  in  practice  there  are  many  more problems to be

   solved before relativistic speeds can be approached.

        The peculiar  property  of  microwaves   heating  all  material

   containing the water molecule means that any animal  luckless enough

   to be nearby  may  be cooked from the inside out; vegetation will be

   scorched where a saucer lands; and  any  rocks  containing  water of

   crystallization will be blasted.  Every housewife with  a  microwave

   knows all this;  only  hard-headed  scientists  and soft-headed true

   believers are completely dumbfounded.   The UFOnauts would be cooked

   by their own  engines,  too,  if they left the flight  deck  without

   shielding.  This probably  explains  why  a  pair  of UFOnauts, in a

   widely published photograph,  wear   reflective  plastic  jumpsuits.

   Mounting the betatrons outboard on a disc is an efficient way to get

   them away from the crew’s compartment, and the plating  of  the hull

   shields the interior.   At high accelerations, increasing amounts of

   power are transformed into radiation,  making  the centrifugal drive

   inefficient in strong  gravitational  fields.   The  most  practical

   employment of this   engineering  is  for  large  spacecraft,  never

   intended to land.   The  flying  saucers  we  see  are  very  likely

   scouting craft sent  from mother ships moored in orbit.   For  brief

   periods of operation,  the  heavy fuel consumption of the Mark I can

   be tolerated, along with radiation  leakage  –  especially  when the

   planet being scouted is not your own.

        When you  compare  the  known  operating features  of  particle

   centrifuges with the eyewitness testimony, it is fairly evident that

   any expert claiming  flying  saucers  to be utterly beyond any human

   explanation is not doing his homework,  and  he should be reexamined

   for his professional license.

        For dramatic purpose, I have classified the development  of the

   flying saucer through five stages:

        Mark I    – Electronic centrifuges mounted around a fixed disc,


        Mark II  – Electronic centrifuges  mounted  outboard  around  a

                   rotating disc.

        Mark III  –  Electronic centrifuges mounted outboard  around  a

                   rotating disc,  period  of cycles tuned to harmonize

                   with ley lines, for jet assist.

        Mark IV  – Particle centrifuge tuned to modify time coordinates

                   by faster than light travel.

        Mark V    –  No centrifuge.   Solid  state  coils  and  crystal

                   harmonics transforms  ambient  field   directly  for

                   dematerialization and      rematerialization      at

                   destinations in time and space.

        Now that the UFO phenomenon has been demystified and reduced to

   human ken, we  can  proceed  to prove the theory.  If your resources

   are like those of the PLO, you can  go  ahead  and  build  your  own

   flying saucer without any further information from  me,  but  I have

   nothing to work with except the junk I can find around the house.

        I found  an  old  electric motor that had burned out, but still

   had a few turns left in it.  I drilled  a  hole  through the driving

   axle so that  an eight inch bar would slide freely  through  it.   I

   mounted the motor  on  a  chassis so that the bar would rotate on an

   eccentric cam.  In this way in end of the bar was always extended in

   the same direction while the other  end  was always pressed into the

   driving axle.  As  both ends had the same angular  velocity  at  all

   times, the end  extending  out  from  the  axle  would always have a

   higher angular momentum.   This   resulted  in  a  concentration  of

   centrifugal acceleration in one direction.  when  I  plugged  the in

   the motor, the  sight  of my brainchild lurching ahead – unsteadily,

   but in a constant direction, – gave  me  a  bigger  thrill  than  my

   baptism of sex – lasted longer, too.  But not much  longer.  In less

   than twenty seconds the burned-out motor gasped its last and died in

   a puff of smoke; the test run was broadcast on radio microphone but

   the spectacle was lost without television.  Because my prototype did

   not survive long  enough  to  run in two directions I had to declare

   the test inconclusive because of mechanical breakdown.  So, what the

   hell, the Wright brothers didn’t  get  far  off the ground the first

   time they tried either.  Now that I know the critter  will  move, it

   is worthwhile to  put  a  few  bucks  in  to  a new motor, install a

   clutch, and gear the transmission  down.   One  problem at a time is

   the way it goes.

        A rectified centrifuge small enough to hold  in  one  hand  and

   powered by solar  cells,  based  on my design, could be manufactured

   for about fifty dollars (depending  on  production  and  competitive

   bids).  Installed on  Skylab,  it would be sufficient  to  keep  the

   craft in orbit  indefinitely.   A larger Hyperspace Drive (as I call

   this particular design)  will   provide   a   small   but   constant

   acceleration for interplanetary  spacecraft  that  would  accumulate

   practical velocities over runs of several days.

        It is  rumored  that  a  gentleman by the name of Dean invented

   another kind of antigravity engine  sometime  during  the past fifty

   years, but I  have  been  unable to track down any more  information

   except that its   design   consists  of  wheels  within  wheels.   A

   gentleman in Florida, Hans, Schnebel,  sent  me  a  description of a

   machine he built and tested that is similar in principle to the Dean

   drive.  Essentially, a large rotating disk has a smaller rotating

   disc on one  side  of  the main driving axle.  The  two  wheels  are

   geared together so  that  a weight mounted on the rim of the smaller

   wheel is always at the outside of  the  larger wheel during the same

   length of arc of each revolution, and always next to  the  main axle

   during the opposite  arc.   What happens is that the velocity of the

   weight is amplified by harmonic coincidence  with  the  large  rotor

   during one half of its period of revolution, and diminished during

   the other half  cycle.   This  concentrates  momentum  in  the  same

   quarter continually, to  rectify  the  centrifuge.   The  result  is

   identical to my Hyperspace Drive, @ut has the beauty of continuously

   rotating motion.  Now, if the Dean  drive  is  made with a huge main

   rotor, – like about thirty feet in diameter – there  is  enough room

   to mount a series of smaller wheels around the rim, set in gimbals

   for attitude control,  an  Mr.  Dean  himself  has himself a model T

   Flying Saucer requiring no license from the AEC.

        In 1975, Professor Eric Laithwaite,  Head  of the Department of

   Electrical Engineering at  the  Imperial  College   of  Science  and

   Technology in London,   England,   invented   another   approach  to

   harnessing the centrifugal  force   of   a  gyroscope  to  power  an

   antigravity engine – well, he almost invented it,  but  he  did  not

   have the sense to hold onto success when he grasped it.  Professor

   Laithwaite is world-renowned  for his most creative solutions to the

   problems of magnetic-levitation-propulsion systems, and the fruit of

   his brain is  operating today in  Germany  and  Japan,  his  railway

   trains float in the air while traveling at over three  hundred miles

   per hour.  If  anyone  can  present  the  world  with  a proven anti

   gravity engine, it must be the professor.

        Laithwaite satisfied  himself   that   the  precessional  force

   causing a gyroscope  to wobble had no reaction.   This  is  a  clear

   violation of Newton’s  Third Law of Motion as ‘generally conceived’.

   Laithwaite figured that  if  he   could   engage   the  precessional

   acceleration while the  gyroscope  wobbled  in  one   direction  and

   release the precession while it wobble in other directions, he would

   be able to demonstrate to a forum of colleagues and critics at the

   college a rectified  centrifuge  that worked as a proper antigravity

   engine.  His insight was sound but  he  did  not  work it out right.

   All he succeeded in demonstrating was a ‘separation  between  action

   and reaction,’ and  his  engine did nothing but oscillate violently.

   Unfortunately, neither Laithwaite  or his critics were looking for a

   temporal separation between action and reaction, so  the loophole he

   proved in Newton’s  Third Law was not noticed.  Everyone was looking

   for action without  reaction,  so   no  one  saw  anything  at  all.

   Innumerable other inventors  have  constructed  engines  essentially

   identical to Laithwaite’s, including a young high school dropout who

   lives across the street from me.

        Another invention  described  is  U.S. Patent disclosure number

   3,653,269, granted to Richard Foster, a retired chemical engineer in

   Louisiana.  Foster mounted his gyroscopes  around the rim of a large

   rotor disc, like a two cylinder flying saucer.  Every time the rotor

   turns a half cycle, the precessional twist of the gyros  in reaction

   generates a powerful  force.   During  the  half cycle when Foster’s

   gyros were twisting in the other direction,  his  clutch grabbed and

   transmitted the power to the driving wheels.  During  the other half

   cycle, the gyros twisted freely.  Foster claims his machine traveled

   four miles per hour until it flew to pieces from centrifugal forces.

   After examining the  patents,  I agreed that it looked like it would

   work, and it  certainly would fly  to  pieces  because  the  bearing

   mounts were not  nearly  strong  enough  to  contain   the  powerful

   twisting forces his  machine  generated.   Foster’s design, however,

   cannot be included among antigravity  engines  because  it would not

   operate off the  ground.   He  never  claimed it would,  and  Foster

   always described his  invention  truthfully  as nothing more than an

   implementation of the fourth principle of locomotion.

        What Laithwaite needed was another  rotary  component, like the

   Dean drive, geared to his engine’s oscillations so  that  they would

   always be turned  to drive in the same direction.  As it happens, an

   Italian by the name of Todeschini recently secured a patent on this

   idea, and his working model is said to be attracting the interest of

   European engineers.

        When the  final  rectifying  device  is  added to the essential

   Laithwaite design, all the moving  parts  generate  the vectors of a

   vortex, and the  velocity  generated  is  the axial  thrust  of  the

   vortex.  Therefore I call inventions based on this design the Vortex


        By replacing the Hyperspace modules of the Mark I Flying Saucer

   with Vortex modules,  still  retaining the essential betatron as the

   centrifuge, performance is improved for the Mark II.  To begin with,

   drive is generated only when the  main  rotor  is  revolving, so the

   saucer can be  parked with the motor running.  This  eliminates  the

   agonizing doubt we all suffered when the Lunar Landers were about to

   blast off to  rejoin  the  command  capsule:  Will the engine start?

   This would explain why the ring of lights around the rim of a saucer

   is said to  begin  to revolve immediately  prior  to  lift  off.   A

   precessional drive affords  a  wider  range  of  control,   and  the

   responses are more  stable  than  a direct centrifuge.  But the most

   interesting improvement is the result  of  the  ‘structure’  of  the

   electromagnetic field generated by the Vortex drive.   By amplifying

   and diminishing certain  vectors  harmonically,  the Mark III flying

   saucer can ride  the  electromagnetic   current   of   the   Earth’s

   electromagnetic field like the jet stream.  And this is just what we

   see UFO’s doing,  don’t  we,  as  they  are reported  running  their

   regular flight corridors   during   the   biennial  tourist  season.

   Professor Laithwaite got all this  together when he conceived of his

   antigravity engine as  a  practical  application of  his  theory  of

   “rivers of energy  running  through space”; he just could not get it

   off the drawing board the first time.

        The flying saucer consumes  fuel  at  a  rate  that  cannot  be

   supplied by all the wells in Arabia.  Therefore we  have  to  assume

   that UFO engineers  must  have  developed  a practical atomic fusion

   reactor.  But once the Mark III is  perfected,  another  fuel supply

   becomes attainable, and no other is so practical for  flying saucer.

   The Moray Valve  converts  the Mark III into a Mark IV Flying Saucer

   by extending its operational capabilities  through ‘time’ as well as

   space.  The Moray  Valve,  you  see,  functions  by   changing   the

   direction of flow of energy in the Sun’s gravitational field.  It is

   the velocity of energy that determines motion, and motion determines

   the flow of  time.   We  shall  continue  the  engineering of flying

   saucers in the following essays.

        My investigation  into antigravity  engineering  brought  me  a

   technical report while  this  typescript  was  in preparation.   Dr.

   Mason Rose, President   of   the  University  for  Social  Research,

   published a paper describing the  discoveries  of  Dr.  Paul  Alfred

   Biefeld, astronomer and  physicist at the California  Institute  for

   Advanced Studies, and   his  assistant,  Townsend  Brown.   In  1923

   Biefeld discovered that a heavily charged electrical condensor moved

   toward its positive pole when suspended  in  a  gravitational field.

   He assigned Brown  to  study  the effect as a research  project.   A

   series of experiments showed Brown that the most efficient shape for

   a field propelled condensor was a disc with a central dome.  In 1926

   Townsend published his   paper   describing   all  the  construction

   features and flight characteristics  of  a flying saucer, conforming

   to the testimony of the first flight witnessed over Mount Rainer

   twenty-one years later  and  corroborated  by thousands of witnesses

   since. (The Biefeld-Brown Effect explains  why  a Mark III rides the

   electromagnetic jet stream.)

        We may speculate that flying saucers spotted from  time to time

   may not only  include  visitors  from  other  planets  and travelers

   through time, but also fledglings from an unknown number of cuckoo’s

   nests in secret experimental plants  all  over the world.  The space

   program at Cape Canaveral may be nothing more than  a  supercolossal

   theatre orchestrated by  Cecil B. Demille to reassure Americans that

   they are still ‘numero uno’ after  Russia  beat  our  atomic  ace by

   putting Sputnik into  orbit.   We  need  not doubt that  the  Apollo

   spaceships got to  the Moon, but we may wonder if Neil Armstrong was

   the first man to land there.  The  real  space program may have been

   conducted in secret as a spin-off from the Manhattan  Project  since

   the end of  World War II, and Apollo 13 may have been picked up by a

   sag wagon to make sure our team scored  a  home  run every time they

   went to bat.   The  exploration  of  space  is  the  most  dangerous

   enterprise ever taken on by a living species.  Don’t you ever wonder

   why the Russians  are  losing  men  in  space  like  a  safari being

   decimated in headhunter country, while  nothing  ever happens to our

   boys except accidents during ground training?

                                                       -T.B. Pawlicki

   Well, I hope  you  enjoyed  that.   Coming  soon in  our  series  of

   informational speculations:

                       Build your own Time Machine,

                    Build your own Pyramid or Megalith,

                           Turn lead into gold,

                Create a worldwide communications network,

                         and my personal favorite,

                       How to build an atomic bomb.

   Now if someone  knows  how  we  can  clone  a person using household

   materials, that would be the topper  of the toppers.  Keep your mind

   open, but not so open that your brains fall out…


                This file courteously supplied to KeelyNet

                      by the Darkside (Ken Geest) at



   Vanguard Notes

   I had the  pleasure  of  meeting  Tom  at  the  1987 Global Sciences

   Congress in Denver.  He is as fascinating  in person as his writings

   indicate.  Tom has also written 2 excellent books,  “How  to Build a

   Flying Saucer” and  “Hyper-Space”.   We  have  kept in contact since

   that time by mail.

           You may write Tom at :  T. B. Pawlicki

                                   843 Fort Street

                                   Victoria, B.C.

                                   V8W 1H6


more links

Information and Theories – Aug 6, 2004, 08:49
Egyptian Pyramids and Orion Corelation Theory

Space and Astrology – Aug 6, 2004, 08:40
Ultra Telescope Planned For Super Telescopic Visions

UFO and Alien Section – Aug 6, 2004, 08:35
Travis Waltons “Fire In The Sky” Abductee Story

Simply Unexplainable – Aug 6, 2004, 08:19
Cattle Mutilations Mystery Still Not Solved

UFO and Alien Section – Aug 6, 2004, 08:13
Grooms Lake Is Not To Be Judged – Courts ordered

UFO and Alien Section – Aug 6, 2004, 08:10
British Airways Are No Strangers To UFO’s

UFO and Alien Section – Aug 6, 2004, 07:40
Roswell- The UFO Crash Story With Pictures

Information and Theories – Aug 6, 2004, 06:37
Tipping the Cable Guy

Simply Unexplainable – Aug 6, 2004, 06:16
Examining Magic for Good and Bad

Information and Theories – Aug 6, 2004, 05:45
Finding your inner self through meditation

Space and Astrology – Aug 5, 2004, 12:20
Aura Post Launch report – Studying Earths Atmosphere

NASA Articles – Aug 5, 2004, 12:18
The global carbon cycle affects Earth’s climate

Information and Theories – Aug 5, 2004, 12:12
VAD battery-powered heart pump Helps Hearts

Other Exciting News – Aug 5, 2004, 12:08
Cryogenic breathing gas technology