What’s so unlikely is that evolution (planetary as well as life) passed up Venus. Many of my opponents seem to believe there’s still life on Mars, frozen and otherwise radiated to death seems not an obstacle to that form of life, even though there’s not a single image of anything upon Mars that’s remotely as artificial looking as what’s existing on Venus.
Somewhere, Richard Hoagland stirs in his coffin… Somewhere there’s an honest scientist, a researcher that’s still alive and gives a damn. Obviously many folks are so afraid of the dark, afraid of what our NASA/NSA/DoD will do onto them if they should offer to help out.
This is truly pathetic; perhaps you’re all NASA Borgs, as you just proved it again and again, as what’s the harm in giving usable advice to a village idiot. All that I’ll do is imply whatever I can, as determined and subsequently related to a doable mission, not that any manned mission to VL2 is necessary, it’s just a darn good if not testy idea that ott to work, unless NASA has been lying to us all along, about all that lack of radiation during those Apollo days, perhaps this was not exactly true. As usual, I can’t seem to expect any forthcoming nor truthful answers from any such NASA Borg. That leave the door wide open for others of similar or better expertise, perhaps yourself, to taking the lead as well as the credits, such as ESA’s team of researchers is capable of doing so much with not 10% of the funding NASA/NSA/DoD have to work with. BTW; those radiation charts I’ve mentioned and provided a direct link to in my L2 radiation research page, those of official NASA record of Earth L2 (EL2), which are obviously going to be of lesser dosage than what’s at VL2, these are sort of in conflict with what ISS is officially reporting as internally receiving 100 millirem (1 mSv/day) per day (that’s excluding any solar maximum flares).
Perhaps the error or my misunderstanding is because ISS offers so much shielding as well as for being at 400 km and not of the 590 km as some of those charts were calculated upon, as well as for their electing which of the lesser forms of radiation we’re talking about (it gets unnecessarily confusing, to say the least). http://guthvenus.tripod.com/vl2-radiation.htm and http://guthvenus.tripod.com/vl2-rocket.htm So, as for relocating ISS to VL2, I could still use an honest answer or two (radiation as well as for rocket energy requirements), else I could go about my looking into the ulterior motives and of whatever that’s covering up, simply in order to discover upon the facts and truths as will be eventually provided by others. If that’s exactly what you’re thinking your boss (NASA/NSA/DoD) wants to see happen, then so be it. http://guthvenus.tripod.com/venus-nocturnals.htm and http://guthvenus.tripod.com/venus-numbers.htm